|
Threat assessment
|
| Applications |
- Threat Assessment by Law Enforcement Agencies - Threat Assessment by Intelligence Services - Stalking - Domestic Violence - Clinical Psychology and Psychiatry
|
| Publications |
Haas, H. (2004). Gefährlichkeitseinschätzung von Drohungen. (English Translation: Threat Assessment). Kriminalistik. 58(12): 791-799. Homepage "Kriminalistik" |
Escard, E., Haas, H. & Killias, M. (2003). Comportements suicidaires et violences: réflexions criminologiques à partir d'une étude portant sur 21 314 jeunes recrues suisses. (English Translation: Suicide attempts and the propensity for violence - reflections based upon the Swiss Recruits' study sample of 21,314 young males). Encéphale. XXIX: 1-10. Abstract on Medline
|
Haas, H. & Schori, Y. (2000). Menaces de suicide ou d'homicide. (English Translation: Suicidal and Homicidal Threats). Psychoscope. Bern, 9/2000: 24-27. Download text |
Abstract
Threats, hoaxes and other inappropriate communications should be treated as signs of evidence, which have to be interpreted within the given social, cultural and individual context. Specific contexts are: work conflicts, domestic violence, problems of immigrants, threats and stalking of politicians etc. The semiotic model of communication consists of the perpetrator, his message(s), the receiver, the designated victim and potential copycats. When assessing the situation, one needs to explore the personality of the perpetrator (if known) as well as the messages that he sends with standardized catalogues of criteria, as well as the victim's behavior.
Keywords: dangerousness - threat - semiotics - perpetrator - victim - assessment.


|
|
|